Microsoft
The lawsuit, certified last February as a class action, argued that Microsofts designation of some PCs as “Windows Vista Capable” was misleading because many of those computers were not powerful enough to support all of Vistas features, including the sleeker “Aero” user interface.
U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman reversed course and decertified the class late Wednesday. In her decision, she wrote that the people who brought the lawsuit did not prove Microsoft artificially inflated demand for PCs that could run only the stripped-down version of Vista.
They also failed to prove Microsoft was unjustly enriched by sales of “Vista Capable” computers, Pechman wrote.
The judge did leave the door open for individuals to pursue similar lawsuits against Microsoft, however.
Over the last year, the case has made public reams of e-mails between Microsoft, PC makers and chipmakers that show top executives questioning Microsofts marketing plan for the months preceding Vistas January 2007 launch. In part to keep PC demand from dropping off during the important holiday season, Microsoft and computer makers stuck the “Vista Capable” labels on some computers, while marking other, more powerful machines as “Premium Ready,” or able to run a full-fledged version of Vista.
Some e-mails also indicated Microsoft lowered its standards for “Vista Capable” computers to include a certain line of Intel Corp. chips.
While Pechman did not find enough support for the class action suit, she didnt indulge Microsofts request to end the matter with a ruling in its favor. She wrote that the e-mails raised enough questions about Microsofts marketing decisions – and their potential to deceive shoppers – to leave individuals the option to sue.
Microsoft shares closed down 21 cents, or 1.2 percent, at $17.91.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Microsoft
The lawsuit, certified last February as a class action, argued that Microsofts designation of some PCs as “Windows Vista Capable” was misleading because many of those computers were not powerful enough to support all of Vistas features, including the sleeker “Aero” user interface.
U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman reversed course and decertified the class late Wednesday. In her decision, she wrote that the people who brought the lawsuit did not prove Microsoft artificially inflated demand for PCs that could run only the stripped-down version of Vista.
They also failed to prove Microsoft was unjustly enriched by sales of “Vista Capable” computers, Pechman wrote.
The judge did leave the door open for individuals to pursue similar lawsuits against Microsoft, however.
Over the last year, the case has made public reams of e-mails between Microsoft, PC makers and chipmakers that show top executives questioning Microsofts marketing plan for the months preceding Vistas January 2007 launch. In part to keep PC demand from dropping off during the important holiday season, Microsoft and computer makers stuck the “Vista Capable” labels on some computers, while marking other, more powerful machines as “Premium Ready,” or able to run a full-fledged version of Vista.
Some e-mails also indicated Microsoft lowered its standards for “Vista Capable” computers to include a certain line of Intel Corp. chips.
While Pechman did not find enough support for the class action suit, she didnt indulge Microsofts request to end the matter with a ruling in its favor. She wrote that the e-mails raised enough questions about Microsofts marketing decisions – and their potential to deceive shoppers – to leave individuals the option to sue.
Microsoft shares were down 16 cents at $17.96 in afternoon trading.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.